The great capacity of human beings to adapt
to changes in their environment amazes every one of us. Human beings have
immense capacity to change behaviour to suit their purpose. Psychology, as a
subject of study, is the product of the search to unravel what makes human
beings different from other animals.
This page will introduce you to the study of
psychology. We will discuss the meaning of psychology as a science, and the
different branches of psychology. We will discuss the various domains of human
behaviour, and the techniques of studying human behaviour.
Finally, we will discuss why educational
psychology is a foundational course for teacher education.
At the end of this unit, you should be able
to:
· Describe psychology as a scientific study
· Outline the major schools of psychology
· List, with examples, the different domains
of human behaviour
· Examine the contribution of psychology to
teacher education
Psychology as a Science
Science is a method of study. It is not on
itself a body of knowledge. This method of study has unique characteristics. It
is systematic. This means that it follows a definite procedure for gathering
information. The method of science is logical. That is, it has a sequence for
presenting facts and figures. It is verifiable. It is verifiable because data
obtained do not depend on the peculiar character of the person collecting the
data. What this in effect means is that human factors and biases are excluded,
as much as possible, from the report.
Finally, it is replicable. Anyone can follow
the procedure outlined and systematically arrive at the same results.
Psychology is described as a science. It is a scientific study of human
behaviour. It is a scientific study because it follows the scientific method of
study in gathering information.
The scientific method is characterised by
the following distinct steps:
1. Problem: A problem is sensed and
questions are raised.
2. Hypothesis: A hypothesis is stated.
Hypothesis is a tentative answer to the question.
3. Data: Relevant information is gathered.
This information is used to test the hypothesis.
4. Data Analysis: Data gathered are collated
and analysed in relation to the hypothesis.
5. Conclusion: Conclusion is drawn from the
results of analysis of data.
A meaningful study of human behaviour is
based on principles agreed on by the scientific community. The outcome of such
a study must be supported by evidence. The evidence must be personal opinions
or coincidence. Four criteria serve as acid test for a meaningful study of
human behaviour.
These
are outlined below:
(a)
Objectivity
By
objectivity, we mean that the results of the study should not be affected by
the biases or personal preconceptions of the persons carrying out the study.
The researchers must not exaggerate data to support their preconceptions. They
must not ignore relevant evidence that contradicts their hypothesis.
(b)
Validity
Validity
describes the soundness of any scientific study. This means that the study must
measure what it sets out to measure. For example, a researcher who sets out to
ascertain the average height of 12-year old boys and girls in a particular
city, but goes ahead to use a weight measuring instrument to gather data and
report findings in heights units will be reporting an invalid study. The
researcher did not measure the attribute they set out to measure.
(c)
Reliability
Reliability
describes the stability and consistency of measures obtained in a study. This
means that, for a study to be reliable, other workers should, using the same
measuring instrument and procedure for gathering data, arrive at the same
conclusions. For example, a battery of intelligence test administered to the
same child by two or more researchers should produce the same or similar
scores.
(d)
Replicability
A
study is replicable if different researchers, using similar techniques and
similar subjects arrive at similar results and conclusions.
In addition to the criteria specified above,
if you are designing a research project, you must be careful to work with a
representative sample. A sample is representative if it is drawn randomly from
the same population of subjects. This implies that the subjects of the study
must be typical of the kinds of people the researcher seeks to study. For
instance, a study on the effects of television viewing on children’s cognitive
abilities might yield different conclusions depending on the age group or
socioeconomic background of the subjects sampled for the study. You must
consider these basic criteria no matter what research technique you have
selected. Be it a naturalistic observational study or a controlled experimental
study, these basic criteria must be respected.
Domains of Human Behaviour
Psychology is described as the science of
human behaviour. Behaviour is here used to describe a general concept which
covers a wide range of human activities. Some human activities are directly
observable. If behaviour can be directly observed, it is said to be an overt
behaviour. We may cite some examples of overt behaviour. Eye blink, muscle flex
are observable. They are overt behaviour. Also, facial contortion and laughter
are observable. Pounding fufu, driving a car, writing on the sheet of paper are
all observable.
They are overt behaviours. They manifest and
we see them. Some human activities, on the other hand, may not be directly
observable. If you cannot directly observe behaviour, you describe it as covert
behaviour. A covert behaviour can only be inferred from other observations.
Examples of covert behaviour include: thinking, reflection, insight,
conceptualisation, problem-solving.
We can only infer these behaviours from some
other body signs or activities of the individual engaged in the covert
behaviour. Human behaviour may be classified into one of three main domains.
These domains are cognitive domain, psychomotor domain, and affective domain.
We discuss each in more detail.
1. The Cognitive Domain
Human activities or behaviours are
classified under cognitive domain if they generally, knowledge as a cognitive
object. They may be concrete or abstract knowledge. We may cite some examples. Your teacher has taught you that Umaru Musa
Yar’Adua is the Executive President of Nigeria, and you can recollect this
knowledge in the cognitive domain. It is still possible for the teacher to show
you the picture of the President of Nigeria; so when you see Umaru Musa
Yar’Adua in reality you recognise him. That knowledge is concrete knowledge in
the cognitive domain. Again, you are taught that the outer space is a void. The
outer space contains no atmosphere. You are able to recall that knowledge. You
have the knowledge as a cognitive object. It is not possible to take a real
picture of the void of the outer space. Void does not exist as a sensory
experience. It can only be conceptualised, not recognised. Voidance cannot be
seen. The knowledge that the outer space is void is an abstract knowledge in
the cognitive domain.
2.
The
Psychomotor Domain
Human activities or behaviours are
classified under the psychomotor domain if they generally reflect production of
skills. Skill production involves manual control using fine motor actions. We
may cite examples of behaviour at the psychomotor domain. Driving a motor
vehicle is an activity in the psychomotor domain. So is typing on a computer
keyboard. You should take note that when learning objectives are stated on the
psychomotor domain; the instruction must specify the procedure the learner must
adopt to reproduce the required skill. There is no tell-tale instruction for
skill acquisition. The learner must be seen to have reproduced the psychomotor
activity or skill.
3.
The
Affective Domain
Human
behaviour is classified under the affective domain if it generally reflects
emotions, attitude change, and development of interest or aversion. Such
behaviours usually signal a latitude change in affections. We may cite some
examples. Suppose you did not like children before. You undergo the course:
childhood and adolescent psychology. You come to appreciate children. During
your spare time, you take a walk voluntarily, without any promptings, to a
neighbourhood children’s playground.
You unconsciously begin to enjoy the
children and their activities. This attitude change is behaviour in the
affective domain. Take another example. You are known to be abrasive to other
ethnic groups in Nigeria. Your brother brings home from his youth service an
Igbo lady for a wife. You complain and fuss. You openly show your dislike for
the lady. All the same, the lady lives with your family. You discover what a
nice lady she is. You begin to appreciate her and even her other Igbo
relations. You have experienced an attitude change. That change in attitude is
behaviour in the affective domain. Emotions are involved. You can cite other
examples involving development of aversion or even fear or empathy. You should
note that human behaviour is very complex. Behaviour may involve all three
domains simultaneously. It may be difficult to strictly classify such behaviour
belonging to the cognitive domain or psychomotor or affective domain. For
example, the behaviour of a motor vehicle driver who swerves into a gutter to
avoid running over a small child who suddenly jumped onto the road involves
more than one domain.
There is the cognitive calculation of the
speed and the distance of the approaching car from the child. There is the
affective consideration that a human life is at great risk. There is the
psychomotor skill in promptly swerving the car out of the obstacle on the road.
Clearly, all the three domains come into play in that singule behaviour.
Therefore, the classification scheme is for easy conceptualisation and
understanding of behaviours.
Schools of Psychology
There are several schools of psychology. A
school of psychology refers to a perspective, a view, or an interpretation of
human behaviour from a standpoint. Different psychologists have interpreted
human behaviour from different standpoints. The standpoint of a psychologist
determines what aspect of human behaviour they study; what techniques they
employ; the nature of information gathered; and the interpretation of data.
Psychologists who share similar standpoints make up schools of psychology. A
school of psychology has a specific viewpoint, uses a specific technique, and
interprets behaviour from a known standpoint. We shall discuss three schools of
psychology, namely: the psychoanalytic school, the behavioural school, and the
cognitive developmental school.
1.
The
Psychoanalytic School
The father of psychoanalysis is Sigmund
Freud. Freud (1965) proposed that the human mind was topographical and dynamic.
By that, Freud Y 7 meant that there are provinces or divisions in the human
mind. These divisions are always moving and interrelating. According to Freud
(1965), the divisions of the human mind may be conceived as three levels of
consciousness. These levels are: the conscious mind, the preconscious mind, and
the unconscious mind. The conscious mind represents the part of the human mind
where thoughts, feelings, ideas, and images that one is aware of reside. The
preconscious mind refers to the part of the mind directly beneath the conscious
mind. It is from the preconscious mind that thoughts and feelings are easily
brought to human consciousness. The unconscious mind refers to the part of the
human mind that is out of awareness. Thoughts, ideas, feelings, and images that
reside in the unconscious mind are hidden. It is here that human beings bury
thoughts and feelings that cause them anxiety, guilt, fear, and other
psychological discomforts, especially those that are the result of childhood
conflicts. The materials in the unconscious mind are buried deep. They are not
easily accessible. They can be inferred or understand only through dreams,
slips of the tongue, the jokes people tell, manner of dress, life choices,
likes and dislikes, fantasies, and relationships with others. Freud (1965)
proposed that human personality was composed of three systems. These systems
represent mental structures through which biological drives are mediated before
they manifest as behaviour. These mental structures are:The id, the ego, and
the superego.
The id
represents Freudian personality structure that deals with basic instincts. The
id is the seat of psychic energy and biological drives such as hunger, thirst,
sex, self-preservation. The id relishes the pleasure principle. That is, it
strives for the immediate gratification of drives and needs. The ego is the
Freudian part of personality that deals with reality.
The ego
is the rational part of the mind. It regulates the biddings of the id for
immediate gratification of needs. It delays of personality. It is the moral id
gratification to an appropriate opportunity. The ego relishes the reality
principle. That is, it instructs the id to choose an appropriate or best time
and manner for the discharge of psychic energy.
The superego
is the Freudian personality structure i.e. the moral part of human personality.
The superego incorporates the society’s rules and values. It is the agent of
the society. It is the voice of authority or the police of personality. It is
the moral arm of the world, and the values of one’s culture. The superego
mediates the biddings of the id, and the ego.
Note that the id, the ego, and the superego
represent an organised whole. Personality is not made of distinct pieces. The
three mental structures work together to produce one personality type. All
three levels of consciousness or awareness flow through them.
What is important is that the dynamics of
personality will depend on the way that psychic energy is distributed among the
id, the ego, and the superego. If energy is concentrated on the id, the
individual will be uncontrolled and impulsive. The id controlled person will
often find himself in trouble with the law. If energy settled primarily in the
ego, the individual’s behaviour will be more realistic and socially
appropriate. If the energy concentrates mainly with the superego, the
individual’s behaviour will tend toward the rigid and moralistic. Individuals
with very powerful superego have difficulty living full and open lives.
Superego persons cannot initiate changes in social structures. They are usually
pro-establishment persons. We shall not go into the details of Freud’s
psychosexual development.
We will also not discuss Erik Erickson’s
psychosocial development here. However, the crux of the psychoanalytic school
of psychology is that childhood experiences significantly impact adult
behaviour. Predominantly pleasant childhood experiences lead to healthy adult
personality. However, predominantly frustrating childhood experiences lead to
difficulty with personality development. Individuals who have difficulty with
their personality employ in adult life defense mechanisms to protect their weak
ego.
2.
The Behavioural School
The behavioural school of psychology was
founded by John Watson. To the school, the theoretical goal of psychology was
the prediction and control of behaviour. The school focuses on the effect of
learning on human development. The psychologists in the behaviour school seek
to find out how children modify their behaviour as a result of experience.
According to Watson (1930), experience is
the root of human behaviour. What a child learns, that the child becomes.
Watson (1926) posited that a stimulus is the environmental situation or an
internal condition that causes activity in human beings.
Behaviourists believe that the arrangement
of evens or stimuli in the environment determine the child’s behaviour. In
other words, children learn what they become from the events they encounter.
Events in the environment generate consequences. These consequences, as
encountered by the child, determine their behaviour. What this means is that
children are shaped by the environment in which they live.
Therefore, the social environment of the
child significantly impacts development and behaviour. The behavioural school
of psychology initiated the first scientific study of human behaviour. They
studied how specific stimuli or events in the environment gave rise to specific
observable behaviour. Behavioural psychologists maintained that all behaviours
are observable, measurable, and therefore predictable.
3. The
Cognitive Developmental School
The father of the cognitive developmental
school of psychology is Jean Piaget. The school focuses on understanding how
mental structures promote thinking, reasoning, and purposeful or goal-directed
behaviour. The psychologists in this school studied extensively how children
come to know things. The subject matter of study of the cognitive
developmentalists is human cognition. Piaget (1926) was specifically interested
in understanding how children come to use images, symbols, concepts and rules to
construct a worldview.
The cognitive developmental school of
psychology is so named because one basic proposition of the school is that as
people grow, change, and develop, so do their thought processes. Cognitive
psychologists posit that as human beings develop intellectually, they build
schemes or patterns of behaviour and thinking. That is, individuals construct
their own diagrams of the world. Therefore, people’s mental schemes determine
the way they interpret experience. Infants have limited schemes of the world.
Experience, maturation, and learning elaborate those schemes. By adulthood,
schemes have become very complex, encompassing such abstract ideas as love,
peace, democracy, and justice.
Relevance of Educational Psychology to Teacher
The study of educational psychology is
important to the teacher trainee for many reasons. These reasons include the
following:
(i) The major function of the teacher is to
guide growth, development, and learning. Therefore, the teacher needs a
thorough understanding of the patterns and characteristics of human development
and behaviour.
(ii) Childhood and adolescent development
gives the teacher trainee an opportunity to study the child from the early days
of his life through adolescence. The patterns of growth, including times for
rapid, slow, and rounding up of physical, intellectual, social and emotional
development could be conceptualised in a short print span. The teacher trainee
is thus in a position to identify what is normal or abnormal in any child’s
growth and development.
(iii) There are a lot of individual
differences in rate and timing of appearance or unfolding of the various
aspects of the child’s development. The study of educational psychology affords
the teacher trainee a unique opportunity to understand individual differences
in children.
(iv) Hereditary and environmental factors
interact intimately to produce observed behaviour of children. The study of
child development gives the teacher trainee the opportunity to understand
critical environmental factors that influence human growth and development.
(v) The study of educational psychology
empowers the teacher to be able to predict, and control human behaviour. This
in essence aids the teacher in their primary assignment, which is to guide the
child’s development and learning.
(vi) The study of educational psychology
exposes the teacher to various theories that explain human learning,
motivation, information processing and transfer of learning sets. When the
teacher marries the theoretical knowledge with the knowledge of patterns and
characteristics of growth and development at the different stages of child
development, they are in a better position to select age appropriate
educational experience for children.
Psychology is a very broad field of study.
It is an exciting field of human endeavour. Studying psychology will make you
to, understand children’s behavior; it will also give you a deep insight into
your own behaviour. The study of psychology will make you understand human
behaviour better, so you will begin to better appreciate human relationships.
You will begin to experience greater adjustment to the vagaries of human reasoning
and living in a social environment.
0 Comments